Reasons solution of Groupism in General Muslim:Hanafi Vs Salafi Fiqh Ahle Hadith

(This article has been forwarded to us with a request to propagate it for the benefit of Ummat. It has a very good discussion on the reason of increasing groupism among muslims. May Allah give Jaza to the writer. For detail check the campaign at

إِنَّ الَّذِينَ فَرَّقُوا دِينَهُمْ وَكَانُوا شِيَعًا لَسْتَ مِنْهُمْ فِي شَيْءٍ إِنَّمَا أَمْرُهُمْ إِلَى اللَّهِ ثُمَّ يُنَبِّئُهُمْ بِمَا كَانُوا يَفْعَلُونَ
Surely, those who have made divisions in their religion and turned into factions, you have nothing to do with them. Their case rests with Allah alone; then He will tell them what they have been doing. (Anam 6:159)

Reasons & Omissions of Increased Groupism
 General Muslims
(Non Scholars/ Not Ulema)

Edited By
Dr. Syed Abu Tooba for
Campaign to Revive Islamic Ethics Of Disagreement (CRIED) &
Campaign Against Groupism (CAG)

Quran Ayats against Groupism and relation between Muslim

اللہ تعالیٰ کا ارشاد گرامی ہے
إِنَّ الَّذِينَ فَرَّقُوا دِينَهُمْ وَكَانُوا شِيَعًا لَسْتَ مِنْهُمْ فِي شَيْءٍ إِنَّمَا أَمْرُهُمْ إِلَى اللَّهِ ثُمَّ يُنَبِّئُهُمْ بِمَا كَانُوا يَفْعَلُونَ (الأنعام: 159
Surely, those who have made divisions in their religion and turned into factions, you have nothing to do with them. Their case rests with Allah alone; then He will tell them what they have been doing.

وَالَّذِينَ يُؤْذُونَ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ وَالْمُؤْمِنَاتِ بِغَيْرِ مَا اكْتَسَبُوا فَقَدِ احْتَمَلُوا بُهْتَانًا وَإِثْمًا مُبِينًا (الأحزاب: 58)
Allah Subhanahu wa Ta'ala says:
And for those who harm believing men and believing women - without their having done any wrong- they surely burden themselves with the guilt of slander and a glaring sin. [AI-Ahzab 33:58]
Allah Subhanahu wa Ta'ala says:

وَيْلٌ لِلْمُطَفِّفِينَ (المطففين: 1).
الَّذِينَ إِذَا اكْتَالُوا عَلَى النَّاسِ يَسْتَوْفُونَ (المطففين: 2).
وَإِذَا كَالُوهُمْ أَوْ وَزَنُوهُمْ يُخْسِرُونَ (المطففين: 3).
أَلاَ يَظُنُّ أُولَئِكَ أَنَّهُمْ مَبْعُوثُونَ (المطففين: 4).
لِيَوْمٍ عَظِيمٍ (المطففين: 5).
يَوْمَ يَقُومُ النَّاسُ لِرَبِّ الْعَالَمِينَ (المطففين: 6
Woe to Al-Mutaffifin [those who give less in measure and weight (decrease the rights of others)].
Those who, when they have to receive by measure from men, demand full measure,
And when they have to give by measure or weight to men, give less than due.
Do they not know that they are bound to be raised from the dead? (And called to account) on a Great Day!
The Day when all men shall stand before the Rabb of all the worlds. [Al-MutaffifTn 83: 1:6]
يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا لاَ يَسْخَرْ قَومٌ مِنْ قَوْمٍ عَسَى أَنْ يَكُونُوا خَيْرًا مِنْهُمْ وَلاَ نِسَاءٌ مِنْ نِسَاءٍ عَسَى أَنْ يَكُنَّ خَيْرًا مِنْهُنَّ وَلاَ تَلْمِزُوا أَنفُسَكُمْ وَلاَ تَنَابَزُوا بِالأَلْقَابِ بِئْسَ الاِسْمُ الْفُسُوقُ بَعْدَ الإِيمَانِ وَمَنْ لَمْ يَتُبْ فَأُوْلَئِكَ هُمُ الظَّالِمُونَ (الحجرات: 11
O you who believe! Let not one group (of men) laugh sarcastically at another, it may be that the latter are better than the former; nor let (some) women laugh sarcastically at other women, it may be that the latter are better than the former, nor defame one another, nor insult one another by nicknames. It is an evil thing to be called by a bad name, after embracing Iman. Those who do not desist are indeed wrong doers.

يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا اجْتَنِبُوا كَثِيرًا مِنْ الظَّنِّ إِنَّ بَعْضَ الظَّنِّ إِثْمٌ وَلاَ تَجَسَّسُوا وَلاَ يَغْتَبْ بَعْضُكُمْ بَعْضًا أَيُحِبُّ أَحَدُكُمْ أَنْ يَأْكُلَ لَحْمَ أَخِيهِ مَيْتًا فَكَرِهْتُمُوهُ وَاتَّقُوا اللَّهَ إِنَّ اللَّهَ تَوَّابٌ رَحِيمٌ (الحجرات: 12
O you who believe! Avoid much suspicions, indeed, some suspicions are sins. And spy not, neither backbite one another. Would one of you like to eat the flesh of his dead brother? You would hate it (so hate backbiting). And fear Allah. Verily, Allah is the One Who accepts repentance, and is the Most Merciful.
يَا أَيُّهَا النَّاسُ إِنَّا خَلَقْنَاكُمْ مِنْ ذَكَرٍ وَأُنثَى وَجَعَلْنَاكُمْ شُعُوبًا وَقَبَائِلَ لِتَعَارَفُوا إِنَّ أَكْرَمَكُمْ عِنْدَ اللَّهِ أَتْقَاكُمْ إِنَّ اللَّهَ عَلِيمٌ خَبِيرٌ (الحجرات: 13
O mankind! We have created you from a male and a female, and made you into nations and tribes, that you may get to one another. Verily, the most honourable of you with Allah is the one who fears Allah most. Undoubtedly Allah is the All-Knowing, All-Aware. [Al-Hujurat 49: 11-13]

وَإِذَا حُيِّيتُمْ بِتَحِيَّةٍ فَحَيُّوا بِأَحْسَنَ مِنْهَا أَوْ رُدُّوهَا إِنَّ اللَّهَ كَانَ عَلَى كُلِّ شَيْءٍ حَسِيبًا (النساء: 86
When you are greeted with a greeting, greet in return with what is better than it, or at least return it equally. Indeed, Allah keeps carefull account of every thing. [An-Nisa 4: 86]
اللہ تعالیٰ کا ارشاد گرامی ہے

قُلْ هَذِهِ سَبِيلِي أَدْعُو إِلَى اللَّهِ عَلَى بَصِيرَةٍ أَنَا وَمَنْ اتَّبَعَنِي وَسُبْحَانَ اللَّهِ وَمَا أَنَا مِنْ الْمُشْرِكِينَ (يوسف: 108
Say, .This is my way. I call (people) to Allah with full perception, both I and my followers. Pure is Allah; and I am not among those who associate partners with Allah.

اللہ تعالیٰ کا ارشاد گرامی ہے

وَأَنَّ هَذَا صِرَاطِي مُسْتَقِيمًا فَاتَّبِعُوهُ وَلاَ تَتَّبِعُوا السُّبُلَ فَتَفَرَّقَ بِكُمْ عَنْ سَبِيلِهِ ذَلِكُمْ وَصَّاكُمْ بِهِ لَعَلَّكُمْ تَتَّقُونَ (الأنعام: 153
And: This is My path that is straightforward. So, follow it, and do not follow the (other) ways, lest they should make you deviate from His way. This is what He has enjoined upon you, so that you may be Allah-fearing..
اللہ تعالیٰ کا ارشاد گرامی ہے
شَرَعَ لَكُمْ مِنَ الدِّينِ مَا وَصَّى بِهِ نُوحًا وَالَّذِي أَوْحَيْنَا إِلَيْكَ وَمَا وَصَّيْنَا بِهِ إِبْرَاهِيمَ وَمُوسَى وَعِيسَى أَنْ أَقِيمُوا الدِّينَ وَلاَ تَتَفَرَّقُوا فِيهِ كَبُرَ عَلَى الْمُشْرِكِينَ مَا تَدْعُوهُمْ إِلَيْهِ اللَّهُ يَجْتَبِي إِلَيْهِ مَنْ يَشَاءُ وَيَهْدِي إِلَيْهِ مَنْ يُنِيبُ (الشورى: 13
(دین کو قائم رکھنا اور اس میں پھوٹ نہ ڈالنا)
He has ordained for you people the same religion as He had enjoined upon Nuh, and that which We have revealed to you (O prophet,) and that which We had enjoined upon Ibrahim and Musa and Isa by saying, .Establish the religion, and be not divided therein.. Arduous for the mushriks (polytheists) is that to which you are inviting them. Allah chooses (and pulls) toward Himself anyone He wills, and guides to Himself anyone who turns to Him (to seek guidance)
وَاعْتَصِمُوا بِحَبْلِ اللَّهِ جَمِيعًا وَلاَ تَفَرَّقُوا وَاذْكُرُوا نِعْمَةَ اللَّهِ عَلَيْكُمْ إِذْ كُنْتُمْ أَعْدَاءً فَأَلَّفَ بَيْنَ قُلُوبِكُمْ فَأَصْبَحْتُمْ بِنِعْمَتِهِ إِخْوَانًا وَكُنْتُمْ عَلَى شَفَا حُفْرَةٍ مِنْ النَّارِ فَأَنْقَذَكُمْ مِنْهَا كَذَلِكَ يُبَيِّنُ اللَّهُ لَكُمْ آيَاتِهِ لَعَلَّكُمْ تَهْتَدُونَ (آل عمران: 103

Hold fast, all of you, to the cord of Allah, and be not divided. Remember the blessing of Allah upon you: When you were enemies to each other, and He brought your hearts together, so that, you became brothers through His blessing. You were at the brink of a pit of Fire, then He saved you from it. This is how Allah makes His signs clear to you, so that you may take the right path.
Ahadith against Groupism and inter-relation & rights of Muslim

"الدین النصیحۃ، الدین النصیحۃ، الدین النصیحۃ، قلنا: لمن یارسول اللہ(صلی اللہ علیہ وآلہ وسلم) ؟ قال: للہ، ولکتابہ ، ولرسولہ، ولأئمۃ المسلمین وعامتھم" (مسلم:55

Abu Hurairah Radiyallahu 'anhu narrates that Rasullullah Sallallahu 'alaihi wasallam said: You will not enter Paradise until you become a believer, and you will not be a believer until you love one another. May I not guide you to something by which you will love one another? Spread Salam amongst yourselves. (Muslim)

Anas Radiyallahu 'anhu narrates that Rasullullah Sallallahu 'alaihi wasallam said: Help your Muslim brother whether he is an oppressor or is oppressed. A man asked: O Rasiilallah! I will help him when he is oppressed, but how can I help him when he is an oppressor? He replied: You stop or prevent him from oppression for indeed that is your help to him. (Bukhari)
'Abdullah Radiyallahu 'anhu narrates that Rasullullah Sallallahu 'alaihi wasallam said: To abuse a Muslim is disobedience, and his murder is infidelity. (Bukhari)
'Abdullah ibn 'Umar Radiyallahu 'anhuma narrates that Rasullullah §allallahu 'alaihi wasallam said: Anyone who calls his Muslim brother: O infidel! Then surely infidelity returns to one of them. Either he is (infidel) as it is said, o infidelity returns to the one who accused. (Muslim)

Abu Dhar Radiyallahu 'anhu narrates: I heard Rasullullah Sallallahu 'alaihi wasallam saying: He who calls someone an infidel or enemy of Allah, but that person is not guilty, then t! ese words return to the one who blamed. (Muslim)

'A'ishah Radiyallahu 'anha narrates that Rasullullah Sallallahu 'alaihi wasallam said: The man who is most hateful to Allah is the one who quarrels and argues the most. (Bukhari, Muslim)

Abu Hurairah Radiyallahu 'anhu narrates that Rasullullah Sallallahu 'alaihi wasallam said: Whosoever has done a wrong, affecting his brother's honour or something else, must ask him for forgiveness now, before that Day comes when he will have neither Dinar nor Dirham. If he has any good deeds, then these will be subtracted, equal to his wrong doings; and if he has no good deeds, then the evil deeds of the one wronged will be taken and laid upon him. (Bukhari)

'A'ishah Radiyallahu 'anha narrates: I heard Rasullullah Sallallahu 'alaihi wasallam saying: Verily, a Mu'min by his good conduct acquires the rank of one who fasts and stands in Salat during the night. (Abu Dawud 4798)

'Abdullah ibn Mas'ud Radiyallahu 'anhu narrates that Nabi Sallallahu 'alaihi wasallam said: He will not enter into Paradise who has the smallest particle of arrogance in his heart. (Muslim)

Abu Umamah Radiyallahu 'anhu narrates that Rasullullah Sallallahu 'alaihi wasallam said: I guarantee an abode on the boundary of Paradise for him who gives up a quarrel, even if he is right; and an abode in the centre of Paradise for him who abandons lying, even if it is for the sake of fun; and an abode in the highest grade of Paradise for him who excels in good conduct. (Abu Dawud 4800)

'Abdullah ibn 'Amr Radiyallahu 'anhuma narrates: I heard Rasullullah Sallallahu 'alaihi wasallam saying: Indeed, a Muslim who strictly confines himself to Sharia'h and owing to his fine conduct and polite manners, achieves the rank of that person who fasts frequently and stands for prolonged periods in Salat at night reciting the verses of Holy Qur'an. (Musnad Ahmad 2/177)

Malik Rahimahullah says that the following saying of Rasullullah Sallallahu 'alaihi wasallam has been conveyed to me: "I have been sent for the perfection of good conduct." (Muatta Imam Malik)
'Abdullah ibn 'Umar Radiyallahu 'anhuma narrates that Rasullullah Sallallahu 'alaihi wasallam said: Do not harm Muslims; do not condemn them; and do not look for their faults. (ibn Hibban)

Abu Barzah Al-Aslami Radiyallahu 'anhu narrates that Rasullullah Sallallahu 'alaihi wasallam said: O the community of people! who have accepted Islam by their tongues; and Iman has not entered their hearts, do not backbite Muslims nor seek out their faults. Undoubtedly he who seeks out the faults of his Muslim brother, will have his faults sought by Allah; and whose faults are sought by Allah, He will disgrace him even at his home. (Abu Dawud)

Abu Darda' Radiyallahu 'anhu narrates that Rasullullah Sallallahu 'alaihi wasallam said: Shall 1 not inform you of something more excellent in degree than fasting, Sadaqah and Salah? The Sahabah replied: Certainly, do tell us! He answered: It is putting things right between people; for undoubtedly discord between people is destructive. (Tirmidhi)
Humaid ibn 'Abdur Rahman narrates from his mother Radiyallahu 'anha that Nabi Sallallahu 'alaihi wasallam said: He who has spoken untruthfully to strike a reconciliation between two persons has not lied. (Abu Dawud)

Jarir ibn 'Abdullah Radiyallahu 'anhu narrates that Nabi Sallallahu 'alaihi wasallam said: Whoever is deprived of kindness is deprived of all good. (Muslim)

Abu Bakrah Radiyallahu 'anhu narrates: I heard Rasullullah Sallallahu 'alaihi wasallam saying: When two Muslims draw their swords on each other, the killer and the victim both will be in the Fire. Abu Bakrah said: I or someone else asked: O Rasulallah! The killer (about him we can understand), but why the victim? He replied: Indeed he too intended to kill his companion. (Muslim)

Chapter 3
Hard Realities of Current Groupism in Ummat
Islam is a natural religion and the only way of salvation for whole mankind till the day of qiyamat. Islam is very clear and easy to understandable religion. Rather Allah has kept it easy so that each and every person could follow it without any difficulty. Allah has given clear command against groupism.

Academic Discussion or Sectarian war?
 Current Discussion and Controversies among general Muslims affiliated to different groups offline on street and Online on Face book/you Tube videos/Islamic Forums on internet on subject of Taqleed (Following a Mazhab) /Details of prayer like Ameen loud or silent, Position of hand etc. has crossed the limit of any academic pursuit and has become a sectarian war (Mostly verbal sometimes Physical).
The Righteous Scholar (Ulma e Haq) Vs Internet Speakers?
Great Ulemas are not on the scene in this group fighting anywhere especially on internet. You will never see head/Amir/president is discussing arguing with head of Rather they have mostly harmonious relation and respect each other. They sit together and praise each other in conferences and in their personal letters.
There is another set of People on Internet/ Facebook/ You tube videos
Those who are fighting are actually Non Scholar /general Muslim flag bearers and some of the speaker on You tube/(Internet Sheikhs).We call them internet sheikhs because most of this group polemicist otherwise has no ranking in terms of knowledge of Quran and Hadith even in their group but on internet they are presenting as Great Scholar /Fazilatus Sheikh/Allama /Great Mufti.
There are some people on facebook even their real Identity is unknown and the manner they put Postings and comments, at times what to talk about Muslims even a gentle non muslim will not do in such bad manner and words.
Ulma e Haq (Righteous Scholars) are isolated?
Ulema e Haq (The Rightous Scholars) of Ummat are very good people and are not involved in any hate campaign against any group. We talked many of them from different schools and they are in much pain, they want to end this trend of groupism but they feel themselves helpless and not able to withstand the firebrand speakers/ writers who are active online and offline. The Ulmae Haq feels isolated and restricts themselves under the wall of Madarsas and Islamic Institution.

All Muslim Groups are suffering?
Believe me all groups are suffering because of it and a good amount of resources is being engaged in defense. They are victim at one point of time and offender on other point it is only matter of time. All are in pain. E.g. If you search You tube the same speaker will offend other in one video and will become victim of others criticism in next video.
Although all Muslims are in pain and deep anguish because of this problem but it is also a fact that their pain is not reflecting in any effort to rectify it.

Is there organized effort to tackle the menace of groupism?
Do you know any organized effort? If any please tell us on
There is hardly any organized effort to end this offline and online group fighting. There is nothing on ground nothing on Internet. Internet is an easy medium to propagate anything. There are many campaign going on internet and that is visible and obviously having an impact. But hardly any online effort is going on to rectify the problem of groupism.
If you are in doubt just Google it with different key words. You will be disgusted to know that apart from some discrete blogs and some comments here and there, there is nothing on internet to reduce this issue of groupism among general public.

Only 2-5% Muslims involved in groupism but this (2-5% group flag bearers) are active & Organized to spread the menace. While 95% good Muslims are silent.
On the other hand those who are increasing groupism and hatred are very active on Internet and Social Media and it is their main tool of hate campaign. With nearly 850 million active users, internet is very important tool for any good or bad.
The good Muslims who don’t want group fighting are overwhelming majority (nearly 95%) but they are silent. They are feeling pain from groupism but not expressing it. The golden rule is Don’t Rag and don’t be a silent viewer of it is not being followed.

Disconnect between Ulama e Haq (Righteous Scholar) & General Muslims?
When these controversial issues is brought (e.g Questions like Where to place hand in prayer, Ameen loud or silent etc) the general Public does not consult the Ulama e Haqq.
It is also a fact that general public has no access to them directly. Public is not ready to take pain and visit Ulmae Haqq personally. And on the other Hand Ulmae Haqq also does not spare much free time to entertain general Public. There are some means to get in touch with Ulema for an active seeker, but there is no option for passive seeker. It is the main deficit that has given free hand to nuisance speaker.

What the most people Do in controversy/ When group flag bearer bring a contentious issue?
When encountered with, Most of the Muslims do anyone of three actions.
1. They remain silent and just ignore it. (They should instead consult ULMA E HAQ)
2. They accept the biased and concealed version of a fire brand speaker of one group, and become part of problem and fire brand in making.
3. They consult another firebrand of opposite group and take and spread their version.  And this attack and counterattack keeps on going unabated.

Campaign to Revive Islamic Ethics of Disagreement (CRIED) &
Campaign Against Groupism (CAG)
These 2 campaigns have been started by some weak slaves of Allah to do something to stop this menace of groupism between general Muslims. Allah is all doers and he can do anything. We should be optimistic from Allah.

Your co-operation is needed for spreading this message.
What will you get with this campaign?
Certain things are very clear and doubtless.
1st Benefit.
1. A great Reward from Allah is certain innamal Aamalu binniyat. Allah does not judge on the basis of the result rather on the basis of intention and sincerity.
 So even if one person does not leave the groupism there will be 100% reward for those who will do effort to decrease this menace with correct intention.
2nd Benefit.
2. The talk against Groupism will come into online domain. Once it will come in domain many competent Muslims will start doing effort at different level. Just you start it. You will see the result as the talk reaches the public domain.
3rd Benefit
3. The first 2 chapters of the book are Quran Ayats and Ahadith against groupism and detail about Muslim rights and relation with other Muslims. At least those who will read this booklet and understand these will not do groupism.

Many of our friend and well wisher are of the view that
1. There is no solution as the cancer of groupism has progressed too much.
Our view: We should have faith on Allah who can make possible from Impossible.
2. The big leaders of groups are not involved in this campaign so there is no use.

Our view:
1. The big leaders are agreed that menace of groupism should end. Once something will come at ground they will join.
2. We are dealing with groupism in general Muslims. The most of the differences of mainstream muslim groups leaders are of acceptable difference of opinion. So big leaders are not directly involved with the problem.
3. We have nothing to loose as already fire is burning.

May Allah help us.

Whatever is good from Allah and whatever is bad and shortcoming is from our side.
Join the Campaign and suggest the ways to propagate the message.

Join us

Campaign to Revive Islamic Ethics of Disagreement (CRIED)
Campaign Against Groupism (CAG)

Contact us at
Chapter No 2
The most common Muslim’s debate Groups on Fiqh/Jurisprudence/Following an Imam
(In Indian Subcontinent Home of nearly 50% of total muslims of the world)
For understanding the problem let’s first learn the groups. Based on attribute There are 4 Debate Groups among Muslims. We will describe them one by one.

The 1st Group
1. Scholars and Followers of any one of the four Imams in matter of Jurisprudence. (i.e Hanfi, Shafaee, Maliki, Hanbali).
Followers of Four great Imams /Mazhab (i.e Hanfi, Shafaee, Maliki, Hanbali). understand the basis of difference between Imams and has a principle of mutual respect. There are differences between Four Schools but their interrelation is harmonious and their discussion is restricted to academic in nature within wall of Madarsa / Islamic institute.
In Indian subcontinent Hanafi School is overwhelming followed by Muslims.
Shafaee followers are in Kerala and parts of South Karnataka.(Indian states)
But the interrelation between Hanafi and Shafaee is very good.

In Kerala where Muslims (80-90%) are mainly Shafaee Mazhab. They are rich compared to north Indian Muslims..
There are many Madarsaas run by Shafaee Scholars. There are student from North India, for them these shafaee brothers arrange Hanafi teachers for jurisprudence class. They don’t impose Shafaee Fiqh on them. In Madarsa Hanafi& Shafaee students reside under same roof. The Shafaee also call Imam Abu Haneefa as Imam Azam.

Among Hanafis of North India there are also two subgroups
1. Barelvis 2. Deobandis. Similarly among Shafaee of Kerala there are two groups 1.EK Sunni 2. AP Sunni.

But after studying their view point any sensible Muslims will understand that their difference is not on issues rather mainly personality based.The communication gap and perceived mistrust and lack of effort to reconcile have increased their gap.
So any educated and rational Muslim will understand and not indulge in their differences at first sight itself. Through this article we want to save the sensible Muslims from groupism so we are not touching their differences.
Their opponent claim: That these Hanafi Shafaee Maliki Hanabali are blind follower of Imam. Their opponent define Taqleed as blind following. They allege to have stopped all the research. They are giving unnecessary importance to Imams.
Some of these points we will touch latter.

The 2nd Group
Those who don’t follow any one of the four Imams in jurisprudence. They They call themselves as Salafi/Ahle Hadith.
Although they claim and tell not to follow any Imam and to do own research to all muslims.
But as all of these salafi/Ahle Hadith people are not mujtahid and many are not even having good knowledge of Quran and sunnah so practically they also rely on the research of some other scholar.
They mainly give importance to the research of 5 people in
Imam Ibne Taimmiya Rahimullah, Imam Ibne Qayyim Rahimullah,Ibne Kaseer Rahimullah, Nasiruddin Albani Rahimullah & Abdullah Ibn Baaz Rahimulla. Till this point it is OK. Imam Ibne Taimmiya was a great scholars and others also scholars of good repute so Accepting their position in matter of difference of opinion can be justified.
There are also many subgroups and subideology among these. Many are of the opinion that labeling anything other than Muslim is itself a Bidat e.g Famous Orator Dr. Zakir Naik and Yusuf State.

There opponent claim: Salafi /Ahle Hadith consider the opinion of the above scholars as last word for all practical purposes and practically these people are considering these scholas as free from any error. And they are blind follower of these scholars.
Although on many issue these scholars have also differed. An example
Position of hand after Ruku in standing (Qiyam)
Nasiruddin Albani R.A. view is: Hand should be free by the side after Ruku, and no hadith entails to tie hand after Ruku. And he has prohibited tying it.
Abdullah Ibn Baaz R.A. view is : The hand should be tied after Ruku in the same manner as it was before Ruku.

Concluding Remark on these two groups (1st & 2nd)
There could be discussion on pros and cons of these two ideologies but one thing is clear that both have acceptable argument for their position in the matter of difference of opinion.
Their top leadership will not argue and fight with each other. You will not find that an Scholar of Darul Uloom Deobnad (A hanafi Madarsa) is arguing with a Scholar from Jamea Slafia Banaras (A Ahle Hadith madarsa). Rather an Ahle Hadith Madrsa from Bihar in its convocation called a Scholar from Darul Uloom Nadwatul Ulema (A hanafi Madarsa) as chief guest.
So as far as the groupism and unwanted verbal and physical conflict is concerned these two are not involved and they are having cordial relationship in general.

Another two groups 3rd and 4th groups are those who actually claim to be among the above two.

The 3rd Group
This group claim to be from the second Group
(Claiming themselves as Ahle Hadith/Salafi).Most of this group Muslims are non Scholar (Not formally gone to Islamic Madarsa/ Islamic University). It also includes some public speakers of you tube/Islamic channels/TV. Some of them have their own website/Blogs. There are common men at ground bearing flag of their group.
Most of them are a combination of less knowledge and harsh attitude. Their main attribute is to condemn and criticize the scholary opinion of four Imams in matter of jurisprudence.
They are very active on internet and they present the issue of Fiqh difference as Halal Vs Haram and Sometimes Kufr Vs Iman. Reports coming from different cities are certifying that they are creating nuisance in different cities on the name of true Islam.
It is not Rare to hear/read … sentences from these people …….
You are offering Hanafi/Shafaee Salat and I am offering Muhammadi (SAW) Salat ……….. 
Following an Imam is akin to Shirk………..
What was Muhammad (SAW) Either Hanafi/ Shafaee/ Maliki/ Hanbali? (They forget to mention about their group in option).
They claim Imam Abu Haneefah knew only 3 Hadith/ some show generosity and tell 17 Hadith.
They call Taqleed as Blind following.
They claim Fiqh as something parallel or opposite to Quran & Hadith.
They equate the followers of Imam as those who follow their forefathers instead of Quran Hadith

The 4th Group
They claim to be following any one of the four Imam (Hanafi shafae Maliki Hnabali). There is 4th group who has actually come up as a reaction of 3rd group.
Most of them are a combination of less knowledge and harsh attitude. These Flag bearers also uses almost same language as 3rd group on you tube /internet /face book accusing the opponent following Tit for Tat rule............
They call Ahle Hadith/ Salafi as Ghair Muqallid (who are not doing Taqleed) or La Mazhab (La means no i.e without Mazhab.) They alleges following for Ahle Hadith/ Salafi.
They are presenting the writings of the scholars of Salafi School out of context and deriving many interpretation and wrong claims.
The Ghair Muqallids are the creation of British Rule in India.
They have been created by Britishers to divide Muslims.
They are doing Taqleed of their Nafs.
The Imam of Ghair Muqallids are their Nafs

This two groups (3rd & 4th ) complicating it .....and finally reaches for OPEN ABUSE sometimes in words that even a gentle Non Muslim will also not used.

Concluding Remaks on the 3rd and 4th groups
1.These are not only unfortunate cheating and mislead but also one of the greatest fitnah of our  time.
2. It is also setting a very dangerous trend of attack and counterattack in ummah as in the era of free internet/ you tube/face book/Islamic Forums you cannot conceal the truth/tell a lie for long
3.…Imams have based their views on Ahadith and Ahadith on some of these issues are more than one, but Brothers/Groups who are involved in bashing/criticisng others position actually don’t put all the Ahadith ,rather they present Hadith supporting their view and conceal Hadith supporting other views and ………………

4.(Knowingly or Unknowingly) it is not only murder of truth but dangerous also as it leads to loss of trust from Salafus Salehin Imams and Scholars ……Some times to support a particular position they reach upto denying of the criticizer do not present a complete picture to general public...
6. If one group will present one firebrand with filthy tongue other group is presenting his firebrand with same tongue following rule of  tit for tat………
7.This is not only wastage of resources of Muslims but also giving a very wrong signal to general Muslim mass at ground and even to Non Muslims as you cannot stop them on seeing your Polemics video/debate on you tube /internet.

Chapter No 3
Why and How this 3rd and 4th Group Emerged?

In this background we tried to know the reasons of emergence of 3rd and 4th Group. Online and offline we met hundreds of people apparently from this category
This problem is actually the result of free space created by disconnect between true scholars and general public. It is general Muslims misunderstanding and lack of knowledge on some basic issues that’s why they are making jurisprudence difference as issue in this manner and the consequent fighting.
This will also give the answer that why in spite of having difference of opinion the Ulemas of 1st and 2nd Group (True Scholars) are friends. And even the hadith teachers of madarsa never fight on these issues. You have never seen that the muhaddith of daarul uloom deoband (A hanfi madarsa) is debating with muhaddith of jamia salafia banaras (Ahle hadith/salafi madarsa)
This is because they know these facts and because of deep knowledge they cannot be misled.
Isn’t it a surprising situation that actual scholars are not fighting but the general public / video orators are doing heated argumentation and fighting .

Chapter No 4
Reasons & Misunderstanding leading to creation of 3rd and 4th Group.
After doing research on actual problem and doing direct talk with hundreds of people from all four groups following five reasons have been identified. In this book we will describe these five reasons. Out of five the first is one set of misunderstanding and four reasons based on their design.
If you know this five set of reasons you will never fight on jurisprudence issue. If you intend to do a discussion on this issue first please know these five points before any discussion
This has been described with the intention to save Muslims from this wasteful engagement of group fight and to save their time and resources and to bring them to do something positive for their life after death and for Humanity. They are damaging Islam under the cover of true Islam.

1st  reason  of groupism among general muslims is
Set of Misunderstandings in common Mass
Some Wrong Myths and wrong concept around the Issue among general public and internet debaters are there. That’s why they make it an issue of Islam Vs Kufr Right Vs Wrong. These misunderstanding are very prevalent. We asked the questions related with jurisprudence and Taqleed and found that a good number of Muslims even educated ones have some misunderstandings. Unless these misunderstandings are cleared it is very difficult to convey the true message.
Misunderstanding No I
Many people think that controversy / multiple interpretations is in whole deen and in every aspect of Islam. And Taqleed /following Imam is in every aspect of Islam. (When I asked this question they answered ranging from 30-70% based on understanding and observation)
Truth :
It is wrong. There is no controversy in 90% of deen. As ruling with regard to these matter are clear and whosoever has knowledge of language can understand it. And only one ruling and interpretation is possible. And there is no Taqleed /following of any other interpretation in these issue.
Only a minor fraction (at max 10% of Total Rulings) has a chance of more than one interpretation Taqleed is done only in those aspect where more than one interpretation is possible from Ahadeeth.
Famous Jurist Shaykh Khatib Al-Baghdadi writes:
"As far as the Islamic rules are concerned, there are of two types. The first are those which are known by necessity to be part of the Deen of the Prophet sallalahu alaihi wa sallam like the five prayers, Zakaat, fasting in Ramadhan, Hajj; the prohibition of adultery, wine and so on. Taqleed is not allowed in these issues since they are such that everyone should know and understand. The second type are those rules which need to be understood and extrapolated such as the details of the rituals of worship, transactions and weddings, for example, Taqleed is allowed in these issues
Since Allah says:
"So ask the people of remembrance if you know not." (Surah Al-Nahl: 43)
Al-Faqih wal Mutafaqqihah - page 67, vol.2 printed by Darul Iftaa, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia 1389
The famous Islamic jurist, Shaykh Abdul Ghani Al-Nablusi states:
The issues which are agreed upon - without any doubt and by necessity - do not require any Taqleed of any of the four Imams like the obligation of Salaat. Fasting, Zakaat and Hajj, etc. and like the prohibition of adultery and fornication, drinking wine, murder, stealing and usurping. The issues which are debated are the issues where Taqleed becomes necessary."
Khulasataul Tahqeeq fi Hukm at-Taqleed wa at-Talfeeq - page - 4 printed by Al-Yasheeq, Istanbul

Live Examples
1.Nearly 20 years back in Kerala (India) a Person rejected all the Ahadith and interpreted fro Quran that daily prayers are not five rather three. And some people even started following him (Nauzubillah)
What is stand of Islam about this interpretation?
No interpretation whatsoever will be accepted in this case as these are established principles and ample clear from the words and action of prophet that prayers are five. It does not need any interpretation there is no contradiction and no following or Taqleed of any scholar will be made in these type of cases.
Second example.
If a person claims that after Muhammad Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam there is a prophet / prophet can come. And a person from Punjab India claimed these nearly 100 years back presenting interpretation from Quran. So this interpretation will not be accepted as the finality of prophet at Muhammad sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam is ample clear in words. It does not need any interpretation there is no contradiction and no following or Taqleed of any scholar will be made in these type of cases.

Misunderstanding II
Muslims has become divided because of Imams into four groups. And it is creating problems.
The   Truth
Among the Sunni muslims (means all muslims, other than Shias, We don’t know anything about shias) nearly 96% of sunni muslims follow either of the four mazhab/Great Imams, (eg HANAFI’s 47%, SHAFAI 16%, MALIKI 28%, HANBALI 4%.
Salafi/ Ahle Hadith brothers who don’t follow any of the four Imam are nearly 4% of muslim population worldwide.
(This estimation is refrenced to the document THE 500 MOST INFLUENTIAL MUSLIMS 2014 edition by The Royal Islamic Strategic Studies Centre Page no.16&18 and of Wikipedia and merely estimation. Some of the other sources have estimated Hanafis more than 50% of the sunni muslims.)
Certain basic principle of all four Mazhab are
 1.Considering fiqh difference as acceptable form of difference,
2. To respect each other  and their scholars are related with each other as teacher and students.
There are scholary discussion and debate but there is no groupism among them.Their scholars and General public has mutual respect.
Imam Shafaee said about Imam Abu Haneefah
"All are children of Imam Abu Haneefa in matter of Jurisprudence"
"When he Imam Shafaee visited his place. He prayed according to Abu Haneefa mazhab."
In Indian State of Kerala where Muslims are Shafaee. Madarsaas are run by Shafaee. There are  student from North India who are Hanafi.For them They arrange Hanafi teacher for Hanafi Fiqh classes .They remain in same Hostel under same roof.

Misunderstanding III
Taqleed is like a rope in your neck and other end is in Imams Hand. And you and other scholars of present and past have to abide whatever the Imam has said.
The Truth
Imam Ibne Qadama Muqdasee in book Lamatul Etaqad (page 83)
…….to connect oneself in peripheral issues with an Imam like four school of Jurisprudence, and to attach with them is not condemnable as differences in peripheral issue is Rahmat, and Mujtahedin are to be prised even in differences and to get reward for Ijtahad.
There difference on any issue among them is indication of (from Allah side) wasee (broad) Rahmat. And their (four Imams) Ittefaq o Ijma (unanimity) on any issue is itself a final and final (Qataee Qataee 2 times) argument.
Imam Ibne Qadama Muqdasee in book Lamatul Etaqad (Last page 83) translated from urdu translation  published from Saudi Ministry department of Dawat Ifta Wal  Irshad department Saudi Arabia  1419 Hijri.

Faisal Award winner Maulana Abul Hasan Ali Nadvi ( Ali Miyan) R.A. in his book Tareekh e dawat o Azeemat   (The saviors of Islamic sprit in English)
 “Islam has expanded to a vast and fertile areas of Syria, Iraq, Egypt and other African countries,Iran and central Asia. Administration of country, Maashrat, business, has reached to a complex situation. And it was urgent need to extraction and ISTANBAT and interpretation of the fine details of these principles. For this important job a very deep knowledge and understanding of Quran and sunnat and its practical application to the current situation were required.”

“It was bounty from Allah and pinnacle of destiny (IQBAL MANDI) of ummate muslima that muslims got people of special qualities for this important job.
Tareekh e dawat o Azeemat vol 1(page 80-81) {its English translation The saviors of Islamic sprit Vol1}

The Development of Jurisprudence School
Although it is after name of one person like Abu Haneefa /Shafaee /malik /hanbal R.A. But actually there were group of scholars expert in different field like Hadeeth /Quranic Tafseer /Arabic language who actively took part in the process. Again it was relooked and Scrutinized by later scholars without any bias. Their students also differed from their Imam in the light of evidences and this process is continuous e.g............ Imam Abu Haneefa work was scrutenised by Abu Yusuf and Imam Muhammad and many others.

It is a very scientific and rational process based on established priciples. Taqleed of four Imams Is based on Sound Principles of Islam, Safer Rational and obvious choice. It is Closest to Quran And Sunnah as It Is Based On Deep Research By Scholars Of Undisputed Integrity And Has Been Rigorously Scrutinized By Scholars Throughout Its Development And Evolution that’s why Hadith Scholars like Ibne Hajar Asqalani, Imam Nawwi, Imam Tahawi and Ibne Kathir chose to do Taqleed one        of four Imams”

And after all no Imam compelled anyone to follow him .Imam Abu Haneefah said about Fiqh/Jurisprudence

"Ours is no more than an opinion (in matter of difference). We do not oblige or coerce anyone into accepting it. Whoever has a better judgment, let him advance it." 
[ Al Intiqaa', 140.]

 “At the same time there is a justification for those who are not following any one of four Imam
…………if any muslim choose not to follow any of the four Imam and decides to derive rules from Quran and Hadith by his own research. Although it is difficult decision with many risks but he can prove his decision. So it is his decision and no one should make it an issue except counseling him with sincere advice. And anyway criticizing or bashing anyone is not good thing in the light of Quran and Hadith. And mere criticism does not solve any purpose and results more reaction than any good…………………”

Misunderstanding IV
Some brothers claim that Imam and their associates did not know those Ahadith that is claimed to be against their views. Otherwise they would have opined differently. In other words a claim that they were not Masters of Hadith.
These Imams were people of unquestionable authority and were working as a team with many scholars of different field working with them or under them. (A brief mention of them given in Appendix 2)
The Imams and their associate scholar were known to Ahadith (apparantly looking against their views) rather they have discussed it and have presented their understanding about the Hadith and Quranic and Ahadith evidence for their   position.
Imam Al Awzaa`ee met Aboo Haneefah in Makkah and observed:
"Why do you not raise your hands just before rukoo` and after?"
Aboo Haneefah replied:
"There is no recorded word or action of the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, to authenticate this."
"How so," replied al Awzaa`ee,
"when al Zuhree has reported this to me on the authority of Saalim and that of his father who said that the Prophet used to raise his hands at the beginning of the salaah and before and after rukoo`?"
Aboo Haneefah also reported:
"Hammaad related to me through Ibraaheem, through `Alqamah, through al Aswad, and through Ibn Mas`ood that the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, only raised his hands at the beginning of the salaah and did not repeat this action again."
Al Awzaa`ee then suggested that his authorities were more reliable than those of Aboo Haneefah,
Abu Haneefah who countered:
"Hammaad was more knowledgeable than al Zuhree, and Ibraaheem was more knowledgeable than Saalim.
`Alqamah was not below Ibn `Umar in rank. And if Ibn `Umar is to be credited as a companion of the Prophet, then al Aswad has many merits. And the merits of `Abd Allaah ibn Mas`ood speak for themselves.
" At this, al Awzaa`ee remained silent.
[ Reference: Al Fikr al Saamee, 1/320.]
This incidence proves that everyone was after sunnah and evidence based and having proof for his position.
Aboo Haneefah is reported to have said:
"Ours is no more than an opinion. We do not oblige or coerce anyone into accepting it. Whoever has a better judgment, let him advance it."
[ Al Intiqaa', 140.]
We can thus see that all Scholars were followers and upholders of the Sunnah. When the Sunnah was authenticated, no one deviated from it. If differences occurred it was only because of varying understanding or interpretation. However, when this happened each person accepted the other's point of view so long as the interpretation could be sustained by the text and there was no other authentic evidence negating it.
Islam has clear guidelines in this situation
Amir ibn Al-’As رضى الله عنه reported: I heard the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم say,
عَنْ عَمْرِو بْنِ الْعَاصِ أَنَّهُ سَمِعَ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ قَالَ إِذَا حَكَمَ الْحَاكِمُ فَاجْتَهَدَ ثُمَّ أَصَابَ فَلَهُ أَجْرَانِ وَإِذَا حَكَمَ فَاجْتَهَدَ ثُمَّ أَخْطَأَ فَلَهُ أَجْرٌ
“If a judge makes a ruling, striving to apply his reasoning (ijtihad) and he is correct, then he will have two rewards; and if a judge makes a ruling, striving to apply his reasoning and he is mistaken, then he will have one reward.”
[Sahih Muslim, Book 18, Number 4261]
Is not it a surprising situation that actual scholars are not fighting but the general public / video orators are doing heated argumentation and fighting .
Lets understand the reasons behind it for a possible solution.

The 2nd  reason of Groupism among general Muslims is
False claim about Hadith without checking it
The second reason of rising groupism among general Muslims is the wrong claim by speakers of 3rd/4th group that their way is based on sahih Hadith and others position is on Dhaeef Hadith/Imam view.
There are certain speakers / writer/local flag bearers of 3rd/4th groups inform the general muslims.
·       Our position is based on sahih hadith. OR more authentic hadith  OR
·       We are acting according to sahih hadith were as other group is acting on dhaeef hadith or on the opinion of imam.
Example    no     1. Position of hand in prayer.
One group claims
Based on sahih hadith the correct position of putting hand in prayer is on the chest .To putt hand below the chest or below the navel is best on dhaeef hadith or vice versa.
Some proactive and illiterate members of the group may claim that on the chest position is based on hadith and below the chest and below the navel position is opinion of imam shafaee and imam abu hanifa respectively.
While the other group may claim vice versa that below navel is only right position and on the chest is wrong.

Let’s check the correctness of these claim
In this book for checking the correctness of all example we have selected book from salafussaliheen scholars of the past. To avoid any controversy we are not making reference from book of any scholar of any group of last 300 years. We respect all scholars but in matter of difference only refer the earlier scholars.
Although the list of salafussalihin scholars is long but ahle hadith /salafi brothers give more favor to Imam Ibne taimiya and Ibne qaiyeem R A.
 The hanafi and  shafaee scholars also consider them to be salafussalaihin and there is no controversy. So we have referenced the authoritative book ZADUL MAAD written by imam ibne qaiyeem R A for our examples. 

For checking the claim on position of hands in Prayer we consult the zaadul maad by Imam Ibne qaiyeem R A which has a very detail account of prophet prayer. (page no 28 line 5-9 para 2)
“ In takbeer-e- tahrima prophet S A use to say only allahu akbar and simultaneously he use to raise both hand making the finger separated facing towards qibla raising up to shoulder or ear lobe .
Then he will tie the right hand over the risk and for arm of left hand.
There are no authentic  hadith about the position of placing the hand but abu dawood has narrated from Ali Raziallahu Anha that sunnat is to tie hand one over the other and to place below navel
Now it proves that those who are accepting the claim of 3rd and 4th group, have not done proper research. May Allah help the Muslims.

The 3rd reason of groupism among general Muslims is
Presenting one Hadith & Concealing other Hadith by Group Speakers
The 3rd reason of rising groupism among general Muslims is concealment of some Hadith from general public by speakers of 3rd /4th group at time of their claim. These speakers don’t inform the general public about the possibility of more than one correct way (sunnah way) based on more than one hadith for a particular action.
The 3rd /4th Group speaker inform to general Muslims, only one practice of prophet S A and they present one authentic hadith as evidence.
But they do not tell the public / conceal the fact that for this particular action there are other authentic hadith from the prophet and more than one practice by Prophet.
Example No 2 (How to perform Witr? What is Rikats of Witr?)
One  claim
One of my friends was adamant on a particular method of witr prayer. And he presented a hadith for it, and he said that all other methods for offering witr is incorrect.
Let’s examine    the    correctness         of      the    claim
Zaadul maad chapter no 11 page no 51-52.About the witr Salat these Five different methods are mentioned in the book.
Case no     1
After praying 2 rikat Muhammad sallallaahu alaihi wasallam use to sleep, by this way will offer 6 rikaats in 3 times. And each time he will do miswak and ablution. Then he will pray 3 rikaat witr .
Case no     2
Prophet sallallaahu alaihi wasallam  pray 8 rikaats  in a manner that will do salaam at every 2 rikaats .Then will read 5 rikaats witr and will  sit at last only
Case no     3
Prophet sallallaahu alaihi wasallam use to pray 9 rikaats in manner that 8 rikaats continuously , will sit in 8th  rikaats , do hamd and dua will stand without salam . Then in 9th rikaat recite tashhud and will do salam .
After salam will read 2 more rikaats .
Case no     4
7 Rikaats on the above mentioned manner then will read 2 more rikaats in sitting position.
Case no     5
Prophet sallallaahu alaihi wasallam  will pray 2-2 rikaats and 3 rikaats witr at last in which there will be no gap of qaadah and tashhud .

The 4th reason of groupism among general Muslims is
Concealing the Practice of Sahaba Karam on a issue
The 4th reason of rising groupism among general Muslims is concealment / nondisclosure of facts to general public by speakers of 3rd /4th group at time of their claim. In some cases hadith is there but it is weak.
The 3rd /4th group claim.
This hadith is week that’s why we are not practicing this action. But they conceal the fact that hadith is week but was the sahaba practice.
Example No 3 (To Recite Qunoot in Witr)
One group says that we don’t recite qunoot in witr because the Hadith about Qunoot in witr is Dhaeef.
Let’s confirm the issue.
(Zaadul Maad page no 53 Line 6-12)
“In witr Qunoot is not proved from prophet Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam .Only it is mentioned in the Hadith of Ibne Maaja. But Hazrat Ummar R.A. used to recite Qunoot whole year. The recitation of Dua e Qunoot in witr is also proved from the practice of Hazrat Umar, Hazrat Ubai bin kaab, Hazrat Abdullah ibne Masood R.A. “
(Zaadul Maad page no 53)

The 5th reason of groupism among general Muslims is
Misconception spreaded by speakers about Books of Hadith
One Claim
Some people have misinformed the general public that only the Hadith mentioned in Sahih Bukhari and sahih Muslim are Sahih (authentic). Any Hadith not mentioned in Bukhari and Muslim is not authentic or doubtful.
The truth about Sahih Hadith
1)   All the Hadith in Bukhari Sghareef and Muslim Shareef are authentic. And all Ahle Sunnat scholars are unanimous on its authenticity.
2)   All the Sahih Hadith is not included in Bukhari and Muslim Shareef.
3)   There could be Sahih Hadith in books other than Bukhari and Muslim
(Reference: Imam Bukhari has mentioned in the preface of Sahih Bukhari that the number of sahih Hadith that I got is far more than whatever I have collected in Sahih Bukhari. Similar sentiments have been expressed by Imam Muslim also. None have claimed that all the Sahih Hadith are in Bukhari and Muslim.)
4) For a Hadith to be Sahih the chain of Narrators should be correct.
5.) Imam Bukhari has made  criteria for Narrators. Similarly Imam Muslim has made criteria for Narrators.

6.) There are Ahadith whose Narrators fulfill the criteria of Bukhari or Muslim but they are not in Bukhari or Muslim. Thts why it is sometimes mentioned as ‘Sahaih Alal Shartal Bukhari’ OR ‘Sahih Alal Shartal Muslim’ (Authentic on the criteria of Bukhari OR Muslim)
7.) There are Ahadith which fulfill the combined criteria of Bukhari and Muslim together and it is mentioned that Sahih Alal Shartal Saheehain . Technically these Aahadith are among the most authentic but not mentioned in the Bukhari and Muslim.
The 6th reason of groupism among general Muslims
General Public does not know a very important fact that is chronology of Fiqh compilation and Hadith compilation.
It also happens that a Hadith when reaches to Imams (Imam Abu Hanifa, Malik etc) then its chain is strong. But later on when it was being collected in Hadith book then due to some narrators coming after Imam Period this chain becomes weak.
e.g Imam Abu Haneefa date of birth is 80 Hijri (after 70 years of prophet death), All the sihah sitta was collected around 200 years after prophet. Imam Bukhari was the first Muhaddith among Sihah Sitta to collect the Hadith formally in book form his date of birth is 194 Hijri (184 years after prophet death) Other hadith scholars are still later. So a particular hadith may become weak because of narrator of the later period.
The following Table will make the matter understandable

Birth year of Imams
{(A.H. After Hijrat,) Prophet Wafat is 10 years after Hijrat)}
 Death year of Imams

Difference of  period from Prophet Era to birth of  imam
Abu hanifa
80 AH
150 AH
Imam Malik
95 AH
179 AH
Iamam Shafi’i
150 AH
204 AH
Imam Ahmad bin hanbal
164 AH
241 AH
Imam Bukhari
194 AH
256 AH
Imam Muslim
204 AH
261 AH
Imam Abu dawud
202 AH
275 AH
Imam Tirmidhi
209 AH
279 AH
Imam Nasa’i
214 AH
303 AH
Imam Ibn Maja
209 AH
273 AH
May Allah pleased with all of them. They be given best reward for relaying to us the true message of Islam.
From this table, it is quite evident that since a period of two hundred years separates Allah’s Messenger (PBUH) from Imam Bukhari and Imam Muslim, there are bound to be many links between them. Contrast this with the era of Imam Malik and Imam Abu Hanifa (may Allah be pleased with them) not even a period of one hundred years separates them from Allah’s Messenger (PBUH). Among other things, an excessive number of links is one of the causes for differences between narrations. Also, since the compilation of the various hadith books only began in the second century, there were relatively more narrators (at that time). This consequently brought about more differences in the wording of the narrations.

The 7th Reason of Groupism among Muslims
The act of Omissions (Should be done but not done) on the part of good People & Scholars
The First Ommission
Disconnect between Ulama e Haq & General Muslims?
When these controversial issues is brought (e.g Questions like Where to place hand in prayer, Ameen loud or silent etc) the general Public does not consult the Ulama e Haqq.
It is also a fact that general public has no access to them directly. Public is not ready to take pain and visit Ulmae Haqq. And on the other Hand Ulmae Haqq also does not spare much free time to entertain general Public. There are some means to get in touch with Ulema if the public is active seeker, but there is no option for passive seeker. It is the main deficit that has given free hand to nuisance speaker.

The silence of Good Muslims
Only 5-10% of Muslims are in 3rd & 4th Group. Most of the Muslims 90-95% are not interested in group fighting. But this majority is silent spectator. DON’T DO NUISANCE & DON’T BECOME MUTE SPECTATER FOR NUISANCE. This act of omission is giving free space to speakers of 3rd   and 4th Group to do nuisance on the name of Islam.
Our True scholars (Ulmae Haq) have very limited direct contact with general public. The general Muslims gives them full regard but have no access to them. You may argue that there are Islamic magazine from these scholars, but truly speaking its reach is very minimal. It is mainly read by those in scholary circle. Most of these magazines have less than 1000 copies.
Sometimes these scholars do the Dawati and Islahi Tours but it is not enough, India is a country with nearly 20-25 Crore Muslims and there should be continuous programme for more and more contacts between Ulma e Haq and General Public.

The Conclusion
Both the scholars and general should consider it as a work of prime importance and raise voice against Groupism online and Offline. They should try to contact these members of 3rd/4th group and should give them lesson on Islam and Jurisprudence.
Allah knows the best.